bantha_fodder: (bitch please - sloane)
[personal profile] bantha_fodder
This is a link:

This is part of the research for my thesis.

This is an lj cut (please note that it keeps you in the same entry):



this is the text under an lj cut.

This is a fake LJ cut (please note that it is secretly a link that takes you to another page):

(Same link as before)

This is NOT a fake LJ cut; this is in fact a link:

Often, this link will say "fake LJ cut" and the sheer fallacy of such a statement MAKES ME CRY



Are we clear, fandom? Do I need to go over it again? I'm sorry to rant at you, but OMGWTFBBQ!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:46 pm (UTC)
ext_6749: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kirbyfest.livejournal.com
::snicker::

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rhi-silverflame.livejournal.com
Word. Links labeled fake LJ cuts inspire torrential weeping.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teaphile.livejournal.com
Fallacies aside, what is this current fad for fake lj cuts? What's the point?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rhi-silverflame.livejournal.com
I'm guessing, in the case of things like fanfic or icon posts or whatnot, that the intention is for all the comment replies to be in one place, and/or maybe so that there's only one copy floating about in case someone tries to archive without permission.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
But then, why not just link? Why fake cut?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rhi-silverflame.livejournal.com
*scratches head*

Um . . . because a regular old link would make sense, and we just can't have that? Who knows? Maybe some people find that using a fake cut to link to fic is more aesthetically pleasing than just linking it.

It'd be more aesthetically pleasing if they actually made the fake cut look right. :P Either way I still don't see the point of going to the trouble. Seems rather silly to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenofthorns.livejournal.com
Yes, why do people say "fake LJ cut"? Why not just say "here is a link"? I do not understand this at all.

Mostly, I just like looking at your layout, though :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rhi-silverflame.livejournal.com
Moreover, what is the point of going to the trouble of making a fake LJ cut (not that it takes that much time) if you're just going to up and say that it's fake? :P

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ataxi.livejournal.com
My theory: the phenomenon is based on the indignant rage assumed by LJers when people fail to LJ-cut long rants, images, quotations etc. etc. People who have suffered at the hands of this rage are then naturally inclined to try and build up credit by suggesting that when they link to another site, they're politely sparing you the pain that would be incurred were they to cut and paste that entire website into their LJ post.

Such people should be stamped on repeatedly for two reasons: (a) they'll take it, and a good stamping is always fun and (b) they're trying to gain credit just for not being idiots. Which en't on.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
I hope that you are currently working, young man.

Is this really what you think about the matter? Or are you just making it up as you go along?

In excellent news, I have been working on my thesis all morning. No, really.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 07:45 pm (UTC)
ancarett: (Bored Baltar BSG)
From: [personal profile] ancarett
Because people perceive LJ cuts as internal (correct) and faster (also correct, but only marginally unless you're on dial-up, because of the time still needed for many to load the tonnes of images that occasionally lurk behind the cut). A fake LJ cut takes you to a different page and always causes additional load time, even if it is simply to another LJ page.

I could also go on about how people like the idea of staying within a safe (sometimes!), defined community by clicking on LJ cuts. . . . But I'm a historian, not a sociologist.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
I like looking at my layout too. Isn't it ANGSTALICIOUS? In just another minute, she shall turn around and hit him in the mouth. And then they shall have angsty sex.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:07 pm (UTC)
ancarett: Change the World - Jack Layton's Last Letter (Regrets Kara/Lee BSG)
From: [personal profile] ancarett
And then they shall have angsty sex.

Oh, yes please!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenofthorns.livejournal.com
No, because YOU'LL make her go have sex with HELO! Hmmmph! :p

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
OMG she's totally going to have angsty sex with Lee. Trust me on this one. It's Lee you've got to keep an eye on, because he totally wants to sex Cally.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenofthorns.livejournal.com
OMG she's totally going to have angsty sex with Lee. Trust me on this one.

OK, fine - I've been seeing some WORRISOME developments ...

It's Lee you've got to keep an eye on, because he totally wants to sex Cally.

Awww, not Cally! It's not like he's going to stop loving Kara, so it'd just be completely unfair to her. Maybe she can hook up with the Chief, now he's over his Cylon babe!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
OK, fine - I've been seeing some WORRISOME developments ...

Well, I mean, you've got to give the girl a break. All the sex she has with Lee is, by necessity, terribly angsty. Sometimes she wants light-hearted fun sex, and that's what she's got Helo for.

But there will be lots of Kara/Lee soon. It will be ANGSTCAKES. And also HOT. I kept blushing and giggling whilst writing it, which would have been most mortifying had anyone been around to witness it.

Awww, not Cally! It's not like he's going to stop loving Kara, so it'd just be completely unfair to her.

OMG That is the point! ANGSTCAKES. She has an unrequited crush on him, see, and in his ANGST and WOE and ANGER he fools himself into thinking he loves her, when really it's just misguided caring-ness (not a word, thank you) that he has for her. And then he realises, and lets her down terribly, because he's no good with emotions.


Maybe she can hook up with the Chief, now he's over his Cylon babe!

This is a brilliant plan. Or she can hook up with Helo, when he gets back.

...Reading this comment over, it is like I am a crazy person. Really. I should not be let out in polite society.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenofthorns.livejournal.com
But there will be lots of Kara/Lee soon. It will be ANGSTCAKES. And also HOT. I kept blushing and giggling whilst writing it, which would have been most mortifying had anyone been around to witness it.


Hey, I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours. Um, that is SO not how I meant that to come out ... And I have no sexing. Just bitter angstcakes. But would you take a look?

And I DON'T WANT LEE TO HURT CALLY!!! She deserves a nice happy relationship with someone who loves her, not a bitter hurtful relationship based on her unrequited crush on Lee. YOU STOP THAT!!!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 09:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bantha-fodder.livejournal.com
But would you take a look?

Sure thing. Do you still have my email addy?

She deserves a nice happy relationship with someone who loves her, not a bitter hurtful relationship based on her unrequited crush on Lee.

HAHA. Uhm. Sorry? But angstcakes, you know. It's all in the name of Kara/Lee. No, seriously.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-30 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenofthorns.livejournal.com
Sure thing. Do you still have my email addy?


I think so. I have however decided that it sucks and needs a lot of work, so it'll be a while ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bijoux.livejournal.com
I think I've done the fake LJ-cut before, but I don't think I labeled it "fake LJ-cut". Unless I did... Which means I should be struck down by lightning.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-30 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stars-like-dust.livejournal.com
OMG PEN SO BORED.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-31 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bijoux.livejournal.com
You should be writing :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-31 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stars-like-dust.livejournal.com
*laugh* I did. *g*
Page generated Aug. 4th, 2025 01:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios