For those who don't know, I post at
galacticanews. I read so many links, and friendslists belonging to many different people in order to find as much news as possible. I try to link to everything I can, regardless of if I agree with it, or if I think it's pointless, or if I think it's the best thing ever. The only rule is, if it's spec or reaction, it has to be longer than a sentence.
At the end of each edition, I like to rec a fic. I don't link to all the fic out there (that's what
the_wireless is for), but I like to rec one fic that is really great, or about an underused character, or is just really interesting (if not fabulous). This rec is the only part of the newsletter that is based on my opinion. Every other element of the newsletter is a simple presentation of facts.
Couple of weeks ago, during my trawl for links and discussion, I read one or two discussions on the "unfairness" of BSG fandom, and its propensity towards Kara/Lee. This rant was bolstered by a number of comments remarking on the size of the Kara/Lee element in fandom. One of the comments complained that even the newsletter took to reccing Kara/Lee fics.
After reading this thread, I took exception to these comments. I try really hard to be unbiased and fair towards every element of this fandom. The characters, the plot lines, the romances. And if I rec a fic, it's not because you're being repressed by a Kara/Lee shipper. It's because I read a fic, and it moved me, and I want to share it with everyone else.
So, anyway, after I took exception to this, I stopped writing and reccing Kara/Lee for a little while. I wrote two fics (one was a Zarek gen piece, and one was a Galactica gen piece), and every fic I recced on GD was a non-K/L piece.
And that's so stupid. I read some really great fic last week, and I felt like I couldn't rec it simply because I AM a rampant K/L shipper, and everyone knows it, and I wanted to prove that being a K/L shipper doesn't mean oppressing fandom or whatever.
And I'm wondering if I should be swayed by fandom in this way. I am reflecting fandom through GD, so I should rec what's out there. And that is both K/L and non-K/L, and I shouldn't feel restricted in this way. But at the same time, the aforementioned discussion made me contribute more to non-K/L fiction in fandom, and promote more non-K/L fiction in fandom, and that's pretty good too, isn't it?
My Zarek piece went generally unloved. I don't think anybody wants to read about Zarek. I don't feel oppressed: I just don't think that everybody else likes Zarek as much as I do.
At the end of each edition, I like to rec a fic. I don't link to all the fic out there (that's what
Couple of weeks ago, during my trawl for links and discussion, I read one or two discussions on the "unfairness" of BSG fandom, and its propensity towards Kara/Lee. This rant was bolstered by a number of comments remarking on the size of the Kara/Lee element in fandom. One of the comments complained that even the newsletter took to reccing Kara/Lee fics.
After reading this thread, I took exception to these comments. I try really hard to be unbiased and fair towards every element of this fandom. The characters, the plot lines, the romances. And if I rec a fic, it's not because you're being repressed by a Kara/Lee shipper. It's because I read a fic, and it moved me, and I want to share it with everyone else.
So, anyway, after I took exception to this, I stopped writing and reccing Kara/Lee for a little while. I wrote two fics (one was a Zarek gen piece, and one was a Galactica gen piece), and every fic I recced on GD was a non-K/L piece.
And that's so stupid. I read some really great fic last week, and I felt like I couldn't rec it simply because I AM a rampant K/L shipper, and everyone knows it, and I wanted to prove that being a K/L shipper doesn't mean oppressing fandom or whatever.
And I'm wondering if I should be swayed by fandom in this way. I am reflecting fandom through GD, so I should rec what's out there. And that is both K/L and non-K/L, and I shouldn't feel restricted in this way. But at the same time, the aforementioned discussion made me contribute more to non-K/L fiction in fandom, and promote more non-K/L fiction in fandom, and that's pretty good too, isn't it?
My Zarek piece went generally unloved. I don't think anybody wants to read about Zarek. I don't feel oppressed: I just don't think that everybody else likes Zarek as much as I do.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 07:54 am (UTC)I think you should rec whatever you found to be best that day, though working in some diversity sometimes so it's not all Kara/Lee fic. That won't satisfy everyone, but it should satisfy the reasonable sorts.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 07:59 am (UTC)I do try to rec whatever I find best that day, but I acknowledge that if I read a great Baltar fic, for example, as well as a hot hot Kara/Lee fic, I'll rec the K/L because that has more importance to me personally as a reader. Whereas if I thought about it, maybe waited until the next day, I'd rec the Baltar, because reading a great, and interesting, Baltar fic, is something that I feel is more important to fandom as a whole.
Hmm. So the verdict here is more thinking is necessary. Less gut. :o)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:02 am (UTC)And that's so stupid. I read some really great fic last week, and I felt like I couldn't rec it simply because I AM a rampant K/L shipper, and everyone knows it, and I wanted to prove that being a K/L shipper doesn't mean oppressing fandom or whatever.
That's really too bad. You make a good point about your Zarek fic. When a pairing is dominant, or is recced more often, it doesn't necessarily follow that the other pairings are oppressed or despised. It's not like there's a cabal at work, despite what some people seem to think.
It just means that a majority of readers and writers are interested in one pairing, and, well...people will read what they like, write what they like and rec what they like, period.
Complaining "why don't more people read/write/rec my pairing?" doesn't make much sense. They don't read/write/rec it because it's not to their taste, and that's not something that has to be justified or explained, for heaven's sake! I don't think that you should start second-guessing yourself because some people are disgruntled that you didn't rec their ship or their pairing. Just rec whatever you feel like reccing, and if some people choose to assign hidden motives to your choice, it's their problem.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:18 am (UTC)Fandom (mind my view is from the periphery) sometimes seems like this amazing self-policed community where bad form is quickly judged and snarked down. The flip side of that is tolerance is low and one-sided.
Reporting out as you do on a diversity of BSG related topics I think its inevitable that you will 'oppress' some group of fans at one time or another. You do an amazing job find what's out there - I do NOT think you should feel obliged to do more than listen to what's being said. If something rings true to you - you'll do it, if it doesn't then you'll feel as you do - like you engaging in modified behavior unnecessarily.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:20 am (UTC)The gist of my thoughts are: Keep doing what you're doing - which is a fantastic job - and don't avoid K/L recs because someone feels left out.
There's Zarek fic?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:19 am (UTC)On the other hand, in terms of newsletter policy in general, I do find it better personally to either rec *everything* (a la su_herald or sga_newsletter) or nothing. Some of the worst complaints on daily_snitch cane over what they'd rec and what they wouldn't (they have a complicated policy of reccing fic they've seen recced a certain number of times); likewise, the new firefly newsletter got fandom wanked over its arbitrary editor's choice.
the thing is: it's obviously *your* newsletter and your picks and your choices. at the same time, newsletters do try to gather all the news as best as they can, and while everyone knows (well, all thinking people; we have gotten bizarre, "how dare you not post my post that all my three friends saw how dare you not have seen it" complaints) that you can only link to what you see and that that may be biased (slash or pairing heavier due to your flist), when you start linking a particular fic and not another, it moves back into your persional journal space again, if that makes any sense.
In other words, the newsletters try to be impartial and pretend to *not* have much editorial selection which you bring back with a vengeance when you choose one particular fic (i'm totally staying out of the shipper thing, b/c i'm so tired of people complaining about popular pairings...live with it, dammit..), you break that pretense of impartiality.
That all being said, it's your newsletter and you get to do whatever you want. It's an amazing newsletter!!! You are doing an utterly outstanding job!!!! And, personally, being someone who loves the show but doesn't actually read much if any fic, I kind of like your recs, b/c they'll point me to the one thing I might look at...then again, i'd do that if it were recced on your journal just the same!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:14 am (UTC)See, this is what I'm wondering. And I remember those fights over at daily_snitch. In fact, some time ago I was bitching about them, but that was because it wasn't clear if they were recs or a listing. Because they rec so many everyday, it was confusing if the recs were recs or whatever.
I think the 'see three recs' thing makes sense, except when you're in a fandom that doesn't rec so much. I know I read one or two great fics a day in BSG, but I only see a handful of recs per week, so there is no way we could ever make a similar rule. And I understand that's not what you're telling me, i'm just commenting on it.
HMMM. On the one hand, I like going, "this is a fic you might not have seen, I think it's fabulous, give it a go." On the other hand, for the entirety of the rest of it I'm impartial," so.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:26 am (UTC)As for recommendations, they only reflect personal taste. And if the person doing the rec doesn't share our taste...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:28 am (UTC)That doesn't make me a biased reader, though. And certainly as a recc'er, it doesn't make you biased that you tend to relate to some characters and interactions more than others, enjoy them more, find them more compelling than others. And god, if you can take the time to read everything, and comment like woah, and still put together the newsletter? I think you have the right to rec what *you* find good, despite any perceived bias.
It's actually quite a backhanded compliment paid you: your bsgnews deal is evidently pretty central to a lot of the LJ community of BSGlove, despite being totally unofficial and a work of your own dedication and enjoyment rather than a simple feed style thing; the fact that people have ceased to regard it as your personal roundup and rely on it enough to worry about a perceived bias? Wow. Take a bow =)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:28 am (UTC)And I'm wondering if I should be swayed by fandom in this way.
On one hand, you're performing a service for the fandom, so it doesn't hurt to try to go outside what would be...I don't know, your realm, as you are reaching a ton of people in the fandom, all with different ships and opinions and yaddayadda blah.
On the other hand, you're performing a service for the fandom, and people can take it (like me! and love it immensely), or leave it. Or, they could just do it themselves (rec fic that they've found lovely that isn't Kara/Lee). I always say that LJ and fandom are what you make of it, and you've obviously made something wonderful out of it, but it's you that's gone and done it.
I think you should just rec the fic that you feel deserves to be recced - or, if it comes to choosing between a K/L and a Roslin/Billy (I just squicked myself), rec them both. In sum: do what makes you happy, I suppose.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:39 am (UTC)Post whatever you like.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:57 am (UTC)In conclusion: I say keep on keeping on and screw the whiners.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 08:57 am (UTC)Sorry for my bluntness, but this is not the first fandom in which I've encountered this attitude. It was bullshit in those instances and it's bullshit now. The entitlement complex certain people have never ceases to astonish me.
BTW, thank you for posting about the_wireless, which I didn't know existed, and which I have now joined. And thank you for finding all the links for galacticanews, too. I'm a big fan of meta, so getting to find all my meta in one place is fabulous.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:11 am (UTC)I'm suddenly very proud that I cling to the 'been there, done that' philo.
As for the rec thing, I think it's slightly dodgy. Like, 5% dodgy. Yeah, it's a newsletter for general consumption and you do a heck of a time with it. Hi, if people can't take the goodness of all those links to *general content* over a single rec at the end of an issue, whatev. There's PLENTY of other places to go in BSG fandom, Land of 10,000 Overlapping Comms.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:13 am (UTC)I read
I would love to see more non-K/L related stories and links, but at the same time, I know that isn't going to garner the same interest as anything related to K/L does, so I won't be disappointed or upset if there isn't much to see. You can't post what isn't there, and I would hope most readers realize that, and also that if they want to see more non-K/L material, then they should write it and send you the links.
As for me, I've written two BSG stories, one Apollo/Helo and one "Gaeta fantasizing about Apollo and Baltar" story, and I got some nice feedback on them, which is good, but yeah, I felt like I was posting into a void since most of my flist is HP and the BSG slash arena seems like a tiny minority. I still plan to write and post any BSG plot bunnies that come along, though, because I enjoy it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:18 am (UTC)*g*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 09:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 10:06 am (UTC)xx
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 10:35 am (UTC)In the news part you do include links to discussions about all topics, even ones you might not support, and if someone's pet topic of the day hasn't been noticed by you they could just contact you and you will add it. Where is the oppression?
I know there has been rumblings about the lack of diversity in pairings, but that is hardly the fault of a news com that already includes a diverse representation in the discussion links and merely reflects what is going on that day as far as news. The only way to get more diversity is if people start talking and writing about other pairs themselves, and even at that it isn't your job to become a fic rec place on top of what you already do. There are already places to find fic elsewhere.
So yeah, I like the com just the way it is and respect the work that goes into it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 11:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 11:30 am (UTC)I'm for a) myself. ;]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 11:47 am (UTC)Let me put it this way: I have been known to idly bitch about the overwhelming amount of Sheppard/McKay fic in SGA fandom on LJ because I don't see that pairing at all, but I have never once fancied myself in any way "oppressed" because there is so much of it and it is recced so often. People read/write/rec what they like, and on LJ that's mostly Sheppard/McKay. It's recced much more often than anything else because the majority of fic in the fandom is about that pairing, not to oppress anyone.
"Oppression" really doesn't have much meaning if people are throwing it around when fic pairings they don't like are recced. I hope they never discover what real oppression is.
There are already fic rec and fic link communities for BSG, FFS! You take the time to provide this service for BSG fandom, and I think you should rec whatever the hell you like and ignore the whiners.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 12:32 pm (UTC)I love ALL your fic, btw and I LOVE your newsletter and am EXTREMELY grateful for it. Fandom comms are all about a ton of legwork and little thanks. *cuddles*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-25 12:51 pm (UTC)Just remember, in fanfic, it's impossible to please everyone all of the time.